After correctly predicting the results in Commonwealth v. York and in the Autry v. WKU cases, SCOKYBLOG stubbed its toe on Clark v. Commonwealth. Although hedging its bets as much as possible, SCOKYBLOG ultimately predicted a split decision affirming the conviction. The Court however, ultimately rendered a split decision reversing the conviction (in part upon an issue that SCOKYBLOG didn’t give a snowball’s chance in hell of securing a reversal). Although its collective head had swelled with the 2-for-2 start, SCOKYBLOG never realistically anticipated that it would run the table. Oral arguments are just the starting point of the Court’s deliberation process, and, as it turned out, the record in this case turned out not to permit the Court to review the issue that occupied most of the Oral Argument. SCOKYBLOG has a couple of videos to review, and will get a couple more predictions up before the June rendition date. Hopefully, we can make it to the July break still above .500.

Sorry, comments are closed for this article.